Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 14;11:814. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00814

Table 6.

Mediation of the effect of internet use on NSSI through mental disorders.

  Path A Path B Effect SE t p Bootstrapping 95% CI
Mediator variable: Affective disorder
Total effect
1.335** p<.001 .140** p<.001 .183 .074 2.487 .013
Direct effect −.005 .068 −.067 .947
Partial effect of control variables
 Gender 1.491** .229 6.499 <.001
 Age −.069 .086 −.802 .423
Total indirect effect .188* .042 .119,.284
Model summary: R = .375, R2 = .140, F3, 326 = 17.759, p <.001
Mediator variable: Anxiety disorder
Total effect
1.905** p <.001 .064** p <.001 .183 .074 2.487 .013
Direct effect .061 .068 .889 .374
Partial effect of control variables
 Gender 1.491** .229 6.499 <.001
 Age −.069 .086 −.802 .423
Total indirect effect .122* .042 .050,.220
Model summary: R = .375, R2 = .140, F3, 326 = 17.759, p <.001
Mediator variable: OCD
Total effect
.155 p = .005 .432** p <.001 .183 .074 2.487 .013
Direct effect .116 .071 1.643 .101
Partial effect of control variables
 Gender 1.491** .229 6.499 <.001
 Age −.069 .086 −.802 .423
Total indirect effect .067 .031 .018,.114
Model summary: R = .375, R2 = .140, F3, 326 = 17.759, p <.001
Mediator variable: ADHD
Total effect
.978** p <.001 .101** p <.001 .191 .074 2.597 .009
Direct effect .092 .075 1.229 .220
Partial effect of control variables
 Gender 1.482** .230 6.453 <.001
 Age −.074 .086 −.858 .392
Total indirect effect .099* .029 .053,.171
Model summary: R = .377, R2 = .142, F3, 324 = 17.867, p <.001
Mediator variable: CD and ODD
Total effect
.788** p <.001 .144** p <.001 .191 .074 2.597 .009
Direct effect .077 .074 1.048 .295
Partial effect of control variables
 Gender 1.482** .230 6.453 <.001
 Age −.074 .086 −.858 .392
Total indirect effect .144* .033 .059,.191
Model summary: R = .377, R2 = .142, F3, 324 = 17.867, p <.001
Mediator variable: Alcohol abuse and dependence
Total effect
.144 p = .036 .352** p <.001 .206 .078 2.640 .008
Direct effect .155 .075 2.074 .038
Partial effect of control variables
 Gender 1.582** .237 6.670 <.001
 Age −.088 .088 −1.00 .318
Total indirect effect .051 .030 .007,.124
Model summary: R = .396, R2 = .157, F3, 306 = 18.968, p <.001
Mediator variable: Psychoactive substance abuse and dependence
Total effect
.201** p <.001 .405** p <.001 .188 .073 2.565 .011
Direct effect .107 .071 1.515 .131
Partial effect of control variables
 Gender 1.467** .230 6.374 <.001
 Age −.070 .086 −.816 .415
Total indirect effect .081* .033 .029,.163
Model summary: R = .374, R2 = .140, F3, 321 = 17.419, p <.001
Mediator variable: Psychotic disorder
Total effect
.325** p <.001 .356** p <.001 .191 .074 2.597 .009
Direct effect .075 .068 1.105 .270
Partial effect of control variables
 Gender 1.482** .230 6.453 <.001
 Age −.074 .086 −.858 .392
Total indirect effect .116* .037 .056,.204
Model summary: R = .377, R2 = .142, F3, 324 = 17.867, p <.001
Mediator variable Suicidality
Total effect
.217** p <.001 .686** p <.001 .183 .074 2.487 .013
Direct effect .034 .065 .524 .601
Partial effect of control variables
 Gender 1.491** .229 6.499 <.001
 Age −.069 .086 −.802 .423
Total indirect effect .149* .046 .072,.255
Model summary: R = .375, R2 = .140, F3, 326 = 17.759, p <.001
Mediator variable Adjustment disorder
Total effect
.118 p = .039 .269** p <.001 .196 .076 2.569 .010
Direct effect .165 .076 2.179 .030
Partial effect of control variables
 Gender 1.555** .242 6.436 <.001
 Age −.069 .089 −.777 .438
Total indirect effect .032 .023 .001,.096
Model summary: R = .391, R2 = .153, F3, 297 = 17.877, p <.001

**p <. 001.

*p <. 005.

Path A: The effect of the symptoms of internet use on comorbid mental disorders. Path B: The effect of the comorbid mental disorders on prevalence of NSSI.

Effect—unstandardized regression coefficients, SE—standard error of the unstandardized regression coefficients, Bootstrapping 95% CI—95% confidence interval, Number of bootstrap resample: 5,000.

Bonferroni correction was applied to the control for multiple comparison. (p = 0.05/10 = 0.005, p = 0.01/10 = 0.001).

This table shows the detailed statistical results of the 10 mediator models; in Table 7 there is a short summary about the direct and indirect effect of each psychopathological group we examined.