TABLE 6.
Memory performance as a function of self-reported strategy and its interaction with the type of item.
| Strategies |
Position |
Meaning |
Dual |
|||||||||
| ß | SE | t(401) | p | ß | SE | t(401) | p | ß | SE | t(401) | p | |
| (A) Listening< | ||||||||||||
| Words | 0.026 | 0.15 | 0.18 | 0.856 | 0.400 | 0.13 | 3.17 | 0.003 | 0.475 | 0.14 | 3.42 | 0.003 |
| Pseudowords | 0.454 | 0.15 | 3.11 | 0.003 | 0.452 | 0.13 | 3.58 | 0.001 | 0.856 | 0.14 | 6.16 | <0.0001 |
| (B) Position< | ||||||||||||
| Words | 0.374 | 0.13 | 2.94 | 0.005 | 0.448 | 0.14 | 3.21 | 0.003 | ||||
| Pseudowords | –0.002 | 0.13 | –0.02 | 0.987 | 0.402 | 0.14 | 2.87 | 0.005 | ||||
| (C) Meaning< | ||||||||||||
| Words | 0.074 | 0.12 | 0.63 | 0.636 | ||||||||
| Pseudowords | 0.404 | 0.12 | 3.40 | 0.001 | ||||||||
FDR-corrected pairwise comparisons of memory performance for each strategy for words and pseudowords: (A) Listening as ref., (B) Position as ref., (C) Meaning as ref.