Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Jul 9;38(3):582–588. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.07.009

Table 2.

Comparison of demographics, Mini Z survey items, impact of burnout and supportive infrastructure between respondents reporting burnout vs. not burned out.

Burnout (N = 39) Not burned out (N = 87) p Value
N Mean ± SD or N (%) N Mean ± SD or N (%)
Demographics
Age 38 44.1 ± 11.6 84 41.6 ± 10.8 0.234
Years in current clinical practice 38 16.9 ± 10.0 84 15.1 ± 11.0 0.375
Gender • Male 38 16 (42.1%) 84 33 (39.3%) 0.769
• Female 22 (57.9%) 51 (60.7%)
Profession • Nurse 39 12 (30.8%) 87 36 (41.4%) 0.680
• Advanced practice provider (NP/PA) 1 (2.6%) 3 (3.4%)
• Physician 5 (12.8%) 6 (6.9%)
• Physical therapy 0 (0.0%) 1 (1.1%)
• Emergency medical services 20 (51.3%) 37 (42.5%)
• Other 1 (2.6%) 4 (4.6%)
Mini Z burnout survey
Overall satisfied with job (agree, strongly agree) 39 21 (53.8%) 87 82 (94.3%) <0.001
Great deal of stress because of my job (agree, strongly agree) 38 34 (89.5%) 86 46 (53.5%) <0.001
Control over my workload (satisfactory, good, optimal) 39 18 (46.2%) 87 67 (77.0%) 0.001
Time available for documentation (satisfactory, good, optimal) 39 16 (41.0%) 85 66 (77.6%) <0.001
Work atmosphere description (very busy, hectic-chaotic) 38 25 (65.8%) 84 23 (27.4%) <0.001
Value alignment with institution/employer leadership (agree, strongly agree) 39 15 (38.5%) 85 60 (70.6%) 0.001
Degree patient care team works efficiently together (satisfactory, good, optimal) 39 31 (79.5%) 85 82 (96.5%) 0.004
Amount of time spent on EMR at home (moderately high, excessive) 38 14 (36.8%) 82 7 (8.5%) <0.001
Proficiency with EMR use (satisfactory, good, optimal) 38 32 (84.2%) 82 70 (85.4%) 1.000
Impact of burnout and supportive infrastructure
Burnout is important to the well-being of medical professionals 39 39 (100.0%) 87 86 (98.9%) 1.000
Burnout is a potential barrier to the provision of patient care 39 38 (97.4%) 87 85 (97.7%) 1.000
Aware of programs designed to prevent the development ofburnout in healthcare professionals 39 14 (35.9%) 86 29 (33.7%) 0.812
Aware of programs or processes that focus on supporting healthcare practitioners who may be experiencing burnout 39 12 (30.8%) 84 24 (28.6%) 0.803
Programs or processes designed to identify burnout readily available to you 38 2 (5.3%) 84 16 (19.0%) 0.055
Likely to participate in program(s) designed to prevent, or support healthcare practitioners who develop burnout 39 17 (43.6%) 85 40 (47.1%) 0.719

Bold face indicates statistical significance (p < 0.05).