Table 4.
Mini Z burnout survey | Burnout | Not burned out | o Value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | N (%) | N | N (%) | ||
Overall satisfied with job (agree, strongly agree) | |||||
Nurse | 12 | 7 (58.3%) | 36 | 36 (100.0%) | <0.001 |
EMS | 20 | 10 (50.0%) | 37 | 32 (86.5%) | 0.005 |
Great deal of stress because of my job (agree, agree strongly) | |||||
Nurse | 11 | 10 (90.9%) | 36 | 20 (55.6%) | 0.039 |
EMS | 20 | 17 (85.0%) | 36 | 19 (52.8%) | 0.021 |
Control over my workload (satisfactory, good, optimal) | |||||
Nurse | 12 | 5 (41.7%) | 36 | 25 (69.4%) | 0.101 |
EMS | 20 | 10 (50.0%) | 37 | 30 (81.1%) | 0.032 |
Time available for documentation (satisfactory, good, optimal) | |||||
Nurse | 12 | 4 (33.3%) | 36 | 25 (69.4%) | 0.041 |
EMS | 20 | 9 (45.0%) | 35 | 30 (85.7%) | 0.002 |
Work atmosphere description (very busy, hectic-chaotic) | |||||
Nurse | 11 | 9 (81.8%) | 35 | 14 (40.0%) | 0.035 |
EMS | 20 | 12 (60.0%) | 35 | 8 (22.9%) | 0.009 |
Value alignmentwith institution/employer leadership (agree, strongly agree) | |||||
Nurse | 12 | 6 (50.0%) | 35 | 23 (65.7%) | 0.493 |
EMS | 20 | 6 (30.0%) | 36 | 27 (75.0%) | 0.002 |
Degree patient care team works efficiently together (satisfactory, good, optimal) | |||||
Nurse | 12 | 11 (91.7%) | 36 | 35 (97.2%) | 0.441 |
EMS | 20 | 14 (70.0%) | 36 | 35 (97.2%) | 0.006 |
Amount of time spent on EMR at home (moderately high, excessive) | |||||
Nurse | 12 | 3 (25.0%) | 36 | 4 (11.1%) | 0.345 |
EMS | 19 | 7 (36.8%) | 32 | 1 (3.1%) | 0.003 |
Proficiency with EMR use (satisfactory, good, optimal) | |||||
Nurse | 12 | 9 (75.0%) | 35 | 32 (91.4%) | 0.164 |
EMS | 19 | 17 (89.5%) | 33 | 25 (75.8%) | 0.293 |
Bold face indicates statistical significance (p < 0.05).