Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 28;8(8):2325967120946317. doi: 10.1177/2325967120946317

Table 1.

Outcomes for All Surgically Repaired Proximal Hamstring Rupturesa

≤3 Wk (n = 47) >3 Wk (n = 46) P ≤6 Wk (n = 73) >6 Wk (n = 20) P
Age at time of injury, y 50.7 50.5 .927 51.2 48.2 .079
Sex, male/female, n 24/23 13/33 .034 34/39 3/17 .011
Body mass index, kg/m2 25.9 24.7 .126 25.6 24.2 .049
Tear type, partial/complete, n 9/38 19/27 .025 16/57 12/8 .002
VAS score for pain at time of injury 8.4 8.1 .427 8.2 8.5 .960
No. of practitioners seen before surgery 1.4 2.2 <.001 1.6 2.6 .008
Time from injury to surgery, wk 2.0 41.2 <.001 2.7 89.6 <.001
Surgical time, min 67.8 68.4 .700 65.5 77.3 .189
Follow-up, mo 43.7 41.4 .612 43.6 39.5 .801
VAS score for pain at rest 0.6 0.6 .726 0.6 0.8 .808
VAS score for pain with daily activities 1.2 0.9 .896 1.0 1.1 .770
VAS score for pain with strenuous exercise 1.7 1.5 .660 1.6 1.5 .934
Standard LEFS score 73.3 74.2 .427 73.9 73.4 .674
Custom LEFS score 64.4 67.7 .334 65.5 67.9 .634
Standard Marx score 6.1 7.1 .392 6.5 7.1 .710
Custom Marx score 19.9 19.0 .073 19.4 19.5 .941
UCLA score 8.2 8.5 .213 8.2 8.9 .061
No functional limitations, % 53 67 .231 60 60 >.999
Complete satisfaction with surgery, % 87 93 .599 90 90 >.999

aData are presented as the mean unless otherwise indicated. Bolded P values indicate statistically significant differences between acute versus chronic repair. LEFS, Lower Extremity Functional Scale; UCLA, University of California, Los Angeles; VAS, visual analog scale.