Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Aug 31.
Published in final edited form as: Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging. 2019 Jul 11;2019:348–351. doi: 10.1109/isbi.2019.8759295

Table 1.

Intra-site, inter-site, and multi-site prostate segmentation results (Dice overlap (%)) using the Quantile normalization method on data from Stanford (S) and Yale (Y). Values are reported as Median (interquartile range).

Training Data Testing Data
S Y S+Y
S 0.944 (0.039) 0.924 (0.075) 0.935 (0.053)
Y 0.921 (0.085) 0.945 (0.040) 0.933 (0.056)
S+Y 0.944 (0.038) 0.944 (0.044) 0.944 (0.040)