Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 25;13:8475–8493. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S235022

Table 3.

The Correlations Between GAST Expression and Other Clinical Features

Clinical Features No. Cases GAST Expression P-value
High (%) Low (%)
Gender
 Male 121 74 (61.1) 47 (38.9)
 Female 38 18 (47.4) 20 (52.6) 0.187
Age
 ≥60 74 43 (58.1) 31 (41.9)
 <60 85 49 (57.6) 36 (42.4) 0.953
Tumor site
 Cardiac cancer 50 29 (58.0) 21 (42.0)
 Non-cardiac cancer 109 63 (57.8) 46 (42.2) 0.981
Survival status
 Live 75 29 (38.7) 46 (61.3)
 Dead 84 63 (75.0) 21 (25.0) <0.001
Lauren’s classification
 Intestinal type 67 42 (62.7) 25 (37.3)
 Diffused type 92 50 (54.3) 42 (45.7) 0.331
TNM stage
 I 18 6 (33.3) 12 (66.7)
 II 41 24 (58.5) 17 (41.5)
 III 91 55 (60.4) 36 (39.6)
 IV 9 7 (77.8) 2 (22.2) 0.114
Tumor invasive depth (T)
 1 8 3 (37.5) 5 (62.5)
 2 17 7 (41.2) 10 (58.8)
 3 69 37 (53.6) 32 (46.4)
 4 65 45 (69.2) 20 (30.8) 0.062
Lymph node metastasis (N)
 0 47 20 (42.6) 27 (57.4)
 1 22 17 (77.3) 5 (22.7)
 2 38 19 (50.0) 19 (50.0)
 3 52 36 (69.2) 16 (30.8) 0.008
Distant metastasis (M)
 Yes 9 7 (77.8) 2 (22.2)
 No 150 85 (56.7) 65 (43.3) 0.305
p-STAT3 expression
 High 97 64 (66.0) 33 (34.0)
 Low 62 28 (45.2) 34 (54.8) 0.013
MMP11 expression
 High 105 75 (71.4) 30 (28.6)
 Low 54 17 (31.5) 37 (68.5) <0.001