Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Aug 31.
Published in final edited form as: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 May;12(5):e005260. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.005260

Table 3.

Comparison of Methodological Quality Domains Between Studies

Studies Discipline of the Study Allocation Concealment, n (%) Randomization Explained, n (%) Blinding/Masking, n (%)
Current study (n=478) Cardiovascular 4 (0.8) 13 (2.7) 204 (42.7)
Kuriyama et al42 (n=166) Critical care 3 (1.8) 7 (4.2)
Hays et al25 (n=463) General medicine 37 (8.0) 88 (19.0) 137 (60.0)
Peters et al16 (n=18) Otorhinolaryngology 0 (0.0) 12 (60.0)
Cui et al27 (n=328) Clinical pathway 0 (0.0) 328 (100.0) 29 (8.8)
Ghimire et al4 (n=129) General medicine 32 (11.8) 84 (31.0) 102 (37.6)
Mann et al28 (n=129) Gerontology and geriatrics 0 (0.0) 21 (16.3)
Wang et al26 (n=345) Traditional Chinese medicine 0 (0.0) 17 (4.9) 39 (11.3)
Berwanger et al29 (n=227) General medicine 1 (0.4) 92 (40.5)
Hopewell et al30 (n=37) Oncology 0(0.0) 26(70.3) 6 (16.2)