Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 31;91:102659. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102659

Table 5.

Results of the structural model.

Relationship β t-value PCI
Economic Capital → Organisational Resilience 0.163 2.710* (0.071; 0.271)
Social Capital → Organisational Resilience −0.007 0.120 (−0.119; 0.086)
Human Capital → Organisational Resilience 0.401 4.742* (0.264; 0.541)
Physical Capital → Organisational Resilience 0.014 0.166 (−0.123; 0.156)
CSR Environment/Community → Organisational Resilience 0.213 3.477* (0.114; 0.313)
CSR Employees → Organisational Resilience 0.292 4.644* (0.186; 0.393)
Organisational Resilience → Organisational Response COVID-19 0.555 10.007* (0.456; 0.639)
Organisational Resilience → Perceived Job Security 0.458 6.526* (0.339; 0.573)
Organisational Response COVID-19→ Perceived Job Security 0.146 2.008** (0.020; 0.259)
Perceived Job Security → Organisational Commitment 0.416 7.004* (0.310; 0.506)
Control relationships β t-value PCI
Number of employees → Organisational Resilience −0.094 2.204** (−0.167; −0.027)
Number of employees → Organisational Response COVID-19 0.093 1.475 (−0.015; 0.191)
Number of employees → Perceived Job Security −0.004 0.076 (−0.099; 0.091)
Number of employees → Organisational Commitment −0.197 3.212* (−0.296; −0.093)
Tenure → Perceived Job Security 0.004 0.470 (−0.125; 0.059)
Tenure → Organisational Commitment −0.041 0.219 (−0.076; 0.109)
Age → Perceived Job Security −0.116 2.039** (−0.210; −0.024)
Age → Organisational Commitment 0.169 2.689* (0.061; 0.269)
R2(RESIL) = 0.703; R2(RESP) = 0.329; R2(SECUR) = 0.310; R2(COMM) = 0.199
Q2(RESIL) = 0.622; Q2(RESP) = 0.216; Q(SECUR) = 0.221; Q2(COMM) = 0.136

Note 1: * p < 0.01; ** p < 0.05.

Note 2: See Table 5.