Table 3. Estimates for moderated mediation for the relation between disinhibition, mastery-goal orientation, general self-efficacy, and academic dishonesty in women.
| Mastery-goal orientation | Academic dishonesty | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | SE | 95% CI | B | SE | 95% CI | |||
| Mastery-goal orientation (mediator) | - | - | - | B | -0.31** | 0.06 | -0.41, -0.20 | |
| Disinhibition (predictor) | A1 | -0.24** | 0.06 | -0.35, -0.12 | C’ | 0.23** | 0.06 | 0.12, 0.34 |
| General self-efficacy (moderator) | A2 | 0.14* | 0.06 | 0.02, 0.25 | - | - | - | |
| Interaction disinhibition × general self-efficacy | A3 | 0.12* | 0.05 | 0.02, 0.23 | - | - | - | |
| Model summary | R2 = .09; F(3, 286) = 9.85** | R2 = .18; F(2, 287) = 31.08** | ||||||
B = regression coefficients; SE = standard error; 95% CI = 95% confidence intervals; A1, A2, A3, B, and C’ are the paths in the moderated mediation model.
* p < .01
** p < .001