Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Aug 31.
Published in final edited form as: J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2019;22(1):301–312. doi: 10.18433/jpps30471

Table 1.

Mean METH PK parameters ± SD after 1 mg/kg SC METH.

Day 7 (METH naive) Day 19 (post-METH exposure)
Sham (n=6) BDL (n=9) Sham (n=6) BDL (n=9)

METH AUC0−∞ (ng min/mL) 10744 ± 883 16965 ± 2831a 11537 ± 889 16918 ± 4372a
METH t1/2 (min)b 58 ± 5c 94 ± 17a 75 ± 18 87 ± 15
METH Cl (mL/min kg)d 94 ± 7 60 ± 9a 87 ± 7 64 ± 20a
METH Vd (mL/kg)d 7819 ± 798c 8366 ± 1144 9939 ± 2424 7881 ± 869a
AMP/METH AUC0–300 (%) 31 ± 4 25 ± 5a 32 ± 4 27 ± 4a
a)

significant difference between bile duct ligation (BDL) and sham groups (p < .05)

b)

t1/2 values reported as harmonic mean ± pseudo-standard deviation (28)

c)

significant differences between day 7 and 19 (p < .05)

d)

estimated values due to sc rather than iv administration