Table 3.
Results of the multiple regression analyses with standardized coefficients (β) and P values based on the heteroscedasticity-robust HC3 estimator (PHC3) or standard OLS estimates (POLSE).
Independent variable | Motivation for social distancing (R2=.547, P<.001) | Motivation for using a contact tracing app (R2=.457, P<.001) |
Motivation for providing the infection status to a contact tracing app (R2=.423, P<.001) | Motivation for using the Data Donation app (R2=.344, P<.001) | ||||
|
β | PHC3 a | β | POLSE b | β | POLSE | β | POLSE |
Age | –.034 | .34 | –.021 | .61 | –.014 | .74 | –.088 | .05 |
Genderc | –.015 | .70 | –.047 | .22 | –.007 | .85 | .027 | .52 |
Severity of infection | .117 | .003 | .077 | .09 | .027 | .56 | .039 | .43 |
Vulnerability to infection | –.014 | .74 | .072 | .14 | .042 | .40 | .015 | .77 |
Rewards of avoiding social distancing | –.254 | <.001 | –.017 | .70 | –.051 | .26 | –.058 | .23 |
Self-efficacy regarding social distancing | .211 | <.001 | .128 | .006 | .089 | .06 | .008 | .88 |
Response efficacy of social distancing | .401 | <.001 | .103 | .045 | .098 | .07 | .092 | .11 |
Response costs of social distancing | .029 | .41 | .137 | .001 | .056 | .18 | .040 | .37 |
Trust in other people’s social distancing behavior | .118 | .003 | –.078 | .046 | –.087 | .03 | –.103 | .02 |
Day of participation | –.025 | .53 | –.042 | .29 | –.012 | .77 | –.027 | .53 |
Severity of data misuse | N/Ad | N/A | –.098 | .03 | –.075 | .11 | –.070 | .16 |
Vulnerability to data misuse | N/A | N/A | –.219 | <.001 | –.224 | <.001 | –.195 | .001 |
General trust in official app providers | N/A | N/A | .379 | <.001 | .384 | <.001 | .353 | <.001 |
aPHC3: P value based on the heteroscedasticity-robust HC3 estimator.
bPOLSE: P value based on the standard ordinary least squares estimate.
c0=male, 1=female.
dNot applicable.