Table 4.
Subjective feasibility and efficacy of program components
| Intervention component | M (SD) (range 1–4) | % of participants with feasibility score ≥ 3 | M (SD) (range 1–4) | % of participants with effectiveness score ≥ 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physical training | 3.3 (1.0) | 83.0a | 3.4 (1.0) | 78.3a |
| Outdoor walking | 2.9 (1.1) | 67.9a | 3.1 (1.1) | 75.0b |
| Goal-Setting | 3.0 (1.1) | 73.0c | 3.1 (1.1) | 75.0b |
| Self-monitoring by pedometers | 3.1 (1.2) | 68.2d | 2.9 (1.2) | 63.5d |
| Training group | 1.3 (1.0) | 11.3e | 3.7 (0.8) | 85.7f |
| Home visits | n.a. | n.a. | 3.6 (0.8) | 90.6b |
| Phone calls | n.a. | n.a. | 3.1 (1.1) | 79.2b |
Presented are mean scores and standard deviations on the feasibility and effectiveness of the implemented program components as well as the proportion of participants with scores ≥ 3
M mean, SD standard deviation, n.a. not applied
an = 53; bn = 52, cn = 48; dn = 50, en = 47; fn = 7