Table 2.
Regression analyses to analyze the influence of the used theory, the number of items, the range of examinees’ performance, medical school, percentage of MTF items and interactions between the respective theory and the five other variables on conditional reliability at the cut score using, displaying the unstandardized beta (B), the standard error for the unstandardized beta (SE(B)), the standardized beta (β), the t‑test statistic (t), and the probability value (p)
| Variable | B | SE (B) | β | t | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | −0.542 | 0.227 | 0.000 | 0.000 | <0.05 |
| Theory | 0.533 | 0.144 | 0.677 | 13.190 | <0.05 |
| Range of examinees’ performance | 0.011 | 0.002 | 0.753 | 10.503 | <0.05 |
| Number of items | 0.003 | 0.001 | 0.521 | 6.531 | <0.05 |
| Medical school | 0.020 | 0.032 | 0.078 | 0.901 | 0.37 |
| Percentage of MTF items | 0.471 | 0.316 | 0.130 | 1.747 | 0.09 |
| Theory* Range of examinees’ performance | −0.004 | 0.001 | −0.282 | −3.904 | <0.05 |
| Theory* Number of items | −0.001 | 0.001 | −0.150 | −1.868 | 0.07 |
| Theory* Medical school | −0.007 | 0.020 | −0.032 | −0.362 | 0.72 |
| Theory* Percentage of MTF items | −0.197 | 0.200 | −0.074 | −0.988 | 0.33 |