Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 14;35(9):2560–2568. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06029-0

Table 3.

Risk-Adjusted Rates of 30-Day Readmissions and Emergency Department Visits After Hospital Discharge, by Homeless Status and Site of Care

Model 1* Model 2
No. of patients Adjusted rate, % (95% CI) Adjusted OR (95% CI) p value Adjusted rate, % (95% CI) Adjusted OR (95% CI) p value
Readmission rate
Homeless status
Homeless 134,755 27.3 (25.0, 29.7) 1.93 (1.69, 2.21) < 0.001 28.2 (26.3, 30.1) 2.06 (1.84, 2.31) < 0.001
Non-homeless 3,392,628 17.5 (17.2, 17.9) Reference 17.5 (17.3, 17.8) Reference
Site of care
Homeless-serving hospitals 377,654 17.9 (16.6, 19.1) 0.99 (0.89, 1.09) 0.83 17.8 (16.9, 18.6) 0.98 (0.91, 1.06) 0.63
Non-homeless-serving hospitals 3,149,729 18.0 (17.7, 18.3) Reference 18.1 (17.7, 18.3) Reference
Emergency department visit rate
Homeless status
Homeless 134,755 37.1 (34.3, 39.8) 1.98 (1.74, 2.25) < 0.001 37.7 (35.1, 40.2) 2.04 (1.82, 2.30) < 0.001
Non-homeless 3,392,628 23.6 (23.3, 23.9) Reference 23.6 (23.3, 23.9) Reference
Site of care
Homeless-serving hospitals 377,654 22.9 (21.9, 23.9) 0.92 (0.86, 0.98) 0.01 23.3 (22.3, 24.3) 0.94 (0.88, 1.00) 0.07
Non-homeless-serving hospitals 3,149,729 24.4 (24.0, 24.7) Reference 24.3 (24.0, 24.6) Reference

OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval

We used multivariable logistic regression models. Standard errors were clustered at the hospital level to account for the potential correlation of patients treated at the same hospital. ORs of all-cause 30-day readmissions and emergency department visits are shown for each model. Adjusted rates were calculated using marginal standardization for each model

*Model 1 adjusted for patients’ characteristics (the primary diagnosis for the admission, age, sex, race/ethnicity, expected primary payer, and patient comorbidities), state dummies, and quarter dummies

†Model 2 additionally adjusted for discharge disposition, length of stay, and hospital characteristics