Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 31;10:14295. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71234-0

Table 2.

DNA extraction protocol on samples DH_1, DH_2, and CS.

Protocola DNA yield (ng/g)b PCR amplification†
DH_1* (± SD) DH_2
(± SD)
CS (± SD) Kit blankc (± SD) DH_1 DH_2 CS PCR blank
1 BDLd BDL 6,633*,NS (2,310) BDL d +++ 
2 BDL 2.5*,NS (0.1) n.d BDL n.d.d
3 24.6* (0.2) 31.8* (0.2) 1517*,NS (16) 60.1 (3)  + d  +   +   + 
4 BDL 10 (0.1) 660* (6.4) BDL  +  ++ d ++ 
5 BDL 4.6*,NS (0.4) n.d BDL  ++  n.d
6 0.7* (0.1) BDL 513* (14) BDL +++ d  +   + 
7 1.1* (0.2) 17* (0.2) n.d BDL ++  +++  n.d

DNA templates for PCR were diluted 1:2, 1:5, and 1:10 and PCR amplifications of these dilutions were performed in triplicate. Results marked as positive yielded PCR product for all replicates; no amplification product was detected for any replicate for those marked as negative.

aDNA extraction protocols: 1 = Fast DNA SPIN kit for soil (manufacturer’s protocol), 2 = Fast DNA SPIN kit for soil (modified), 3 = OMEGA E.Z.N.A soil DNA kit (manufacturer’s protocol), 4 = Powersoil Isolation kit (manufacturer’s protocol), 5 = Powersoil Isolation kit (modified), 6 = ZymoBIOMICS DNA Microprep kit (manufacturer’s protocol), and 7 = ZymoBIOMICS DNA Microprep kit (modified).

bDNA was extracted from triplicate 1 g subsamples for DH_1 and DH_2, and triplicate 0.5 g subsamples from CS.

cMeasured in ng of DNA.

dBDL = below the detection limit, n.d. = not done, +  = weak PCR band,++  = medium PCR band,+++  = strong PCR band, − = not detected.

*p < 0.05 (based on Student’s t test).

NS Not Statistically Significant (p ≥ 0.05), DH_2: Protocol 2 vs 5 and CS: Protocol 1 vs 3.