Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 31;23(Suppl 5):e25564. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25564

Table 3.

Proportions of adolescents with 100% condom use over time stratified by PrEP adherence at months 3 and 6

  Baseline a Month 3 visit p‐value Baseline a Month 6 visit p‐value
Overall b , c 38 (34%, 25 to 43) 66 (58%, 49 to 68) 0.0002 33 (33%, 24 to 42) 48 (52%, 41 to 62) 0.008
PrEP adherent d 21/67 (31%, 20 to 42) 36/60 (60%, 48 to 72)   17/50 (34%, 21 to 47) 27/49 (55% 41 to 69)  
Non‐PrEP adherent 17/45 (38%, 24 to 52) 30/53 (57%, 43 to 70)   16/50 (32% 19 to 45) 21/44 (48%, 33 to 62)  
a

Baseline figures based on availability of TFV‐DP results to match with self‐reported condom use data for corresponding follow‐up month analysed

b

p‐value of Z‐test for proportions comparing % of consistent condom use between month 3 versus month 6 = 0.329

c

No p‐values calculated from Z‐test for proportions comparing % of consistent condom use between PrEP adherent versus non‐adherent groups within visits reached 0.05

d

PrEP adherent defined as tenofovir‐diphosphate levels ≥700 fmol/punch.