Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 30;10(8):1301. doi: 10.3390/ani10081301

Table 3.

Effect of pasture diversity (diverse or simple) and spatial arrangement (mix or separated) on nutritive value of pastures.

Items Diverse Simple SEM 1 p Values 2
Mix Separated Mix Separated D SA D × SA
Ash, % DM 9.0 10.2 9.2 8.1 0.70 0.21 0.89 0.15
CP, % DM 17.5 bc 16.9 c 18.3 b 21.6 a 0.27 0.01 0.01 0.01
ADF, % DM 20.6 19.7 22.5 19.0 0.99 0.58 0.06 0.24
NDF, % DM 35.9 32.9 41.8 33.4 2.39 0.22 0.05 0.30
NFC, % DM 34.9 37.6 27.8 34.1 2.83 0.11 0.16 0.54
EE, % DM 2.7 2.4 3.0 2.7 0.14 0.10 0.10 0.86
ME, MJ/kg DM 10.9 11.0 10.7 11.1 0.12 0.58 0.06 0.24
TP, mg/g 25.2 b 83.9 a 28.8 b 32.7 b 6.5 0.02 0.01 0.01
CT, mg/g 8.0 8.6 6.9 7.7 0.47 0.08 0.18 0.79

a–c Means within a row with different superscripts differ (p < 0.05). 1 CP: Crude protein; ADF: Acid detergent fiber; NDF: Neutral detergent fiber; NFC: Non-fibrous carbohydrates; EE: Ether extract; ME: Metabolizable energy; TP: Total phenolic; CT: Condensed tannins; 1 SEM: Standard error for interaction; 2 D: Diversity; SA: Spatial arrangement; D × SA: Interaction.