Table 6.
All Studies | Azmi et al. [33] | Mustapha et al. [31] | Ismail et al. [32] | Lim et al. [30] | Zhang et al. [37] | Fiebert et al. [36] | |||||||||||||||
Yes | P | No | Yes | P | No | Yes | P | No | Yes | P | No | Yes | P | No | Yes | P | No | Yes | P | No | |
1. Was a clear definition of the illness given? | 12 | 0 | 0 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||||||||||||
2. Were epidemiological sources carefully described? | 10 | 0 | 2 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | ||||||||||||
3. Were costs sufficiently disaggregated? | 6 | 3 | 3 | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | ||||||||||||
4. Were activity data appropriately assessed? | 7 | 2 | 3 | Yes | Yes | P | Yes | P | No | ||||||||||||
5. Were the sources of all cost values analytically described? | 6 | 4 | 2 | Yes | P | Yes | P | P | Yes | ||||||||||||
6. Were unit costs appropriately valued? | 12 | 0 | 0 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||||||||||||
7. Were the methods adopted carefully explained? | 9 | 3 | 0 | Yes | Yes | Yes | P | Yes | P | ||||||||||||
8. Were costs discounted? | 4 | 0 | 8 | No | No | No | No | No | No | ||||||||||||
9. Were the major assumptions tested in a sensitivity analysis? | 4 | 0 | 8 | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | ||||||||||||
10. Was the presentation of study results consistent with the methodology of the study? | 10 | 2 | 0 | Yes | Yes | Yes | P | Yes | Yes | ||||||||||||
11. Total score by study * | 80 | 14 | 26 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 3 |
Al-Haddad et al. [29] | Amin et al. [27] | Ezat et al. [28] | Annemans et al. [35] | Rohana et al. [26] | Seng et al. [34] | ||||||||||||||||
Yes | P | No | Yes | P | No | Yes | P | No | Yes | P | No | Yes | P | No | Yes | P | No | ||||
1. Was a clear definition of the illness given? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||||||||||||||
2. Were epidemiological sources carefully described? | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||||||||||||||
3. Were costs sufficiently disaggregated? | Yes | P | Yes | P | Yes | P | |||||||||||||||
4. Were activity data appropriately assessed? | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | |||||||||||||||
5. Were the sources of all cost values analytically described? | Yes | No | Yes | P | Yes | No | |||||||||||||||
6. Were unit costs appropriately valued? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||||||||||||||
7. Were the methods adopted carefully explained? | Yes | P | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||||||||||||||
8. Were costs discounted? | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||||||||||||||
9. Were the major assumptions tested in a sensitivity analysis? | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | |||||||||||||||
10. Was the presentation of study results consistent with the methodology of the study? | Yes | P | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||||||||||||||
11. Total score by study * | 9 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 3 |
* Total score by study was the sum of all answers: partially (P), yes (1), no (0).