Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 10;10(8):1383. doi: 10.3390/ani10081383

Table 5.

Normalization with body weight of M-mode parameters compared between breed in normal weight and obese groups. Mean ± SE (median, minimum–maximum) are reported.

M-Mode Parameters Normal Weight Group Obese Group 95% Prediction Interval (cm) [42]
Chihuahua (n = 9) Pomeranian (n = 6) Chihuahua (n = 8) Pomeranian (n = 7)
LVIDd (cm) 1.14 ± 0.06
(1.12, 0.69–1.36)
1.24 ± 0.12
(1.37, 0.94–1.5)
1.34 ± 0.03 *
(1.35, 1.21–1.44)
1.35 ± 0.05
(1.39, 1.03–1.47)
1.27–1.85
LVIDs (cm) 0.61 ± 0.04
(0.61, 0.46–0.82)
0.67 ± 0.07
(0.74, 0.42–0.83)
0.75 ± 0.03 *
(0.72, 0.7–0.89)
0.86 ± 0.05
(0.85, 0.8–0.96)
0.71–1.26
IVSd (cm) 0.46 ± 0.01
(0.46, 0.4–0.53)
0.46 ± 0.03
(0.46, 0.36–0.54)
0.45 ± 0.02
(0.45, 0.38–0.52)
0.48 ± 0.03
(0.46, 0.37–0.68)
0.29–0.59
IVSs (cm) 0.68 ± 0.02
(0.68, 0.6–0.75)
0.71 ± 0.05
(0.7, 0.56–0.85)
0.65 ± 0.02
(0.63, 0.56–0.72)
0.61 ± 0.04
(0.57, 0.49–0.75)
0.43–0.79
LVPWd (cm) 0.56 ± 0.03
(0.53, 0.44–0.72)
0.56 ± 0.04
(0.59, 0.41–0.64)
0.48 ± 0.02 *
(0.45, 0.43–0.58)
0.46 ± 0.03
(0.44, 0.36–0.57)
0.29–0.60
LVPWs (cm) 0.75 ± 0.02
(0.75, 0.67–0.84)
0.76 ± 0.02
(0.76, 0.71–0.81)
0.66 ± 0.03 *
(0.65, 0.57–0.77)
0.63 ± 0.03
(0.64, 0.54–0.76)
0.48–0.87
AO diameter (cm) 0.71 ± 0.03
(0.71, 0.59–0.88)
0.67 ± 0.02
(0.69, 0.58–0.74)
0.73 ± 0.02
(0.74, 0.64–0.78)
0.68 ± 0.01
(0.67, 0.62–0.74)
0.63–0.96
LA diameter (cm) 0.82 ± 0.04
(0.86, 0.63–1.04)
0.80 ± 0.04
(0.82, 0.69–0.84)
0.84 ± 0.03
(0.83, 0.73–0.94)
0.81 ± 0.05
(0.75, 0.7–1.0)
0.59–0.97

* p-value < 0.05 vs. Chihuahua normal weight group, p-value < 0.05 vs. Pomeranian normal weight group. LVIDd, left ventricular internal diameter end-diastole; LVIDs, left ventricular internal diameter end-systole; IVSd, interventricular septum thickness end-diastole; IVSs, interventricular septum thickness end-systole; LVPWd, left ventricular posterior wall end-diastole; LVPWs, left ventricular posterior wall end-systole; AO, aortic root; LA, left atrium.