Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Kidney Dis. 2019 Jul 11;75(1):21–29. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.05.010

Table 5.

Hazard ratio for kidney outcomes in association with randomization to enalapril for the Prevention Trial

  Enalapril Placebo Interaction with time p-value Period of Follow-up
< 6 weeks 6 weeks to 1 year > 1 year
Creatinine Increase by ≥0.3 mg/dl
Unadjusted HR (95% CI) 1.22 (1.04, 1.43) Ref 0.706 1.01 (0.75, 1.36) 1.62 (1.16, 2.27) 1.19 (0.95, 1.50)
*Adjusted HR (95% CI) 1.22 (1.04, 1.43) Ref 0.638 1.01 (0.75, 1.37) 1.64 (1.17, 2.29) 1.19 (0.94, 1.49)
Decline in eGFR By >30%
Unadjusted HR (95% CI) 1.21 (1.02, 1.44) Ref 0.846 0.95 (0.66, 1.36) 1.50 (1.05, 2.14) 1.22 (0.97, 1.55)
*Adjusted HR (95% CI) 1.21 (1.02, 1.43) Ref 0.990 0.95 (0.66, 1.36) 1.50 (1.05, 2.15) 1.21 (0.96, 1.53)
Decline in eGFR By >40%
Unadjusted HR (95% CI) 1.28 (0.96, 1.69) Ref 0.683 1.05 (0.57, 1.90) 1.40 (0.72, 2.71) 1.34 (0.93, 1.93)
*Adjusted HR (95% CI) 1.29 (0.97, 1.71) Ref 0.871 1.05 (0.58, 1.91) 1.42 (0.73, 2.75) 1.35 (0.94, 1.96)
Incident eGFR<30 ml/min/1.73 m2
Unadjusted HR (95% CI) 1.12 (0.67, 1.87) Ref 0.352 1.19 (0.36, 3.91) 1.13 (0.41, 3.13) 1.08 (0.54, 2.17)
*Adjusted HR (95% CI) 1.17 (0.69, 1.98) Ref 0.279 1.15 (0.35, 3.77) 1.16 (0.42, 3.20) 1.18 (0.59, 2.36)

Analyses performed using Cox proportional hazards ratios. Given significant interaction with time in the Treatment trial, follow-up period was divided into 3 separate intervals of <6-weeks, 6-weeks to 1 year, and >1 year. Even though this interaction with time did not reach significance in the Prevention trial, follow-up period was divided in similar fashion for consistency.

*

Adjusted for age, sex, race, NYHA functional class, current smoking, ischemic etiology of left ventricular dysfunction, diuretic use and baseline eGFR.

eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate; HR = hazard ratio; CI = confidence interval; ref=reference