Table 1.
By Genus | ||||||||
No. of Antimicrobial Classes | Campylobacter | E. coli | Salmonella | Shigella | ||||
0 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
1 | 74 | 0 | 3 | 4 | ||||
2 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 7 | ||||
3 | 4 | 17 | 13 | 11 | ||||
4 | 4 | 13 | 13 | 4 | ||||
5 | 0 | 10 | 25 | 20 | ||||
6 | 0 | 13 | 31 | 4 | ||||
7 | 0 | 27 | 9 | 31 | ||||
8 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 16 | ||||
9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | ||||
% potentially resistant to: | ||||||||
≥3 classes | 8 | 97 | 91 | 89 | ||||
≥6 classes | 0 | 57 | 40 | 53 | ||||
No. of isolates tested | 23 | 30 | 32 | 45 | ||||
By geographic location | ||||||||
No. of Antimicrobial Classes | USA | Cambodia | Egypt | Peru | Kenya | |||
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | |||
1 | 15 | 30 | 16 | 17 | 0 | |||
2 | 7 | 13 | 6 | 4 | 0 | |||
3 | 19 | 17 | 0 | 8 | 17 | |||
4 | 15 | 13 | 3 | 4 | 4 | |||
5 | 15 | 4 | 9 | 25 | 33 | |||
6 | 7 | 4 | 16 | 13 | 17 | |||
7 | 19 | 17 | 22 | 13 | 25 | |||
8 | 4 | 0 | 28 | 4 | 4 | |||
9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | |||
% potentially resistant to: | ||||||||
≥3 classes | 78 | 57 | 78 | 71 | 100 | |||
≥6 classes | 30 | 21 | 66 | 34 | 46 | |||
No. of isolates tested | 27 | 23 | 32 | 24 | 24 |