Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 8;21(16):5684. doi: 10.3390/ijms21165684

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Analysis of gallic acid and its derivative methyl gallate content in tea leaves from different samples. (A) Different cultivars. YH1—Yinghong No. 1; YX14—Youxuan No. 14; WLH—Wulinghong; YDHY—Yundaheiye; YH9—Yinghong No. 9; LTDC—Lingtoudancong; GY9—Guanyin No. 9; HY12—Hongyan No. 12; HY4—Hongyan No. 4; WYDC—Wuyedancong; (B) different months; (C) different leaf position; (B,C) The tea leaves were from Camellia sinensis cv. Yinghong No. 9 plant. Data expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) (n = 3). Significant differences between gallic acid and methyl gallate content are indicated ** p ≤ 0.01). FW, fresh weight.