Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 1;20:413. doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-02293-5

Table 3.

The intussusception cases and case ratios during post-rotavirus vaccine introduction period compared to pre-introduction periods

Post-RVV period
(Apr- Sep 2017)
Pre-RVV period
(Oct 2016 - Mar 2017)
Pre-RVV period
(Apr- Sep 2016)
Region (number of sites)a No of cases IS case rate No of cases IS case ratio RR (95% CI) for cases RR (95% CI) for IS case rate No of cases IS ratio RR (95% CI) for cases RR (95% CI) for IS case rate
East (n = 2)a 20 20.4 29 29.9 0.69 (0.33–1.2) 0.67 (0.3–1.28) 45 34.6 0.44 (0.2–1.15) 0.58 (0.32–1.2)
North (n = 1)a 0 0 2 27.4 3 37.5
South (n = 1)a 6 13.3 8 20.4 0.75 (0.45–1.24) 0.65 (0.48–1.23) 11 26.4 0.55 (0.28–1.2) 0.51 (0.3–1.22)
Pooled (n = 4)a 26 16.3 39 27.2 0.67 (0.34–1.19) 0.6 (0.3–1.18) 59 32.8 0.44 (0.22–1.18) 0.5 (0.3–1.2)

Note: IS Intussusception, Intussusception (IS) case rate Intussusception cases per 1000 paediatric surgery admission, RVV Rotavirus vaccine, RR risk ratio with 95% confidence interval (CI), RVV: Rotavirus vaccine

The comparison includes the data from four study sites in three states

aNumbers in the bracket with the regions indicate the numbers of study sites per region where RVV was introduced

Post-RVV period: April 2017 to September 2017 (6 months)

Pre-RVV period: Comparison has been done for two pre-intervention periods of 6 months each; October 2016 to March 2017- the immediate pre-RVV introduction period and April 2016 to September 2016- the calendar months comparable period during the previous year