De-Regil et al. (53) |
Cochrane review |
Variable |
Vitamin D supplementation, during pregnancy, both single-dose or continued, increased 25(OH)D3 levels at term; however, the clinical implication of improving the vitamin D concentration and the possible use of this intervention strategy as part of the routine antenatal care are yet to be evaluated |
Variable |
Mirzakhani et al. (54) |
Review |
Variable |
Well-designed and well-powered clinical trials are needed to determine whether supplementation of vitamin D should be recommended in allergic diseases |
Variable |
Willits et al. (55) |
Review |
Variable |
No association between food allergy and vitamin D level |
Variable |
Yepes-Nuñez et al. (56) |
Systematic review of randomized and non-randomized studies |
Variable |
Vitamin D supplementation for pregnant women, breastfeeding women, and infants may not decrease the risk of developing allergic diseases, such as atopic dermatitis (in pregnant women), allergic rhinitis (in pregnant women and infants), asthma and/or wheezing (in pregnant women, breastfeeding women, and infants), or food allergies (in pregnant women). However, they conclude that the potential impact of vitamin D on food allergy remains uncertain |
Variable |
Saggese et al. (57) |
Review |
Variable |
In food allergies, the role of vitamin D remains controversial |
Variable |
Hawrylowicz et al. (58) |
Review |
Variable |
Longitudinal studies of vitamin D requirements in utero and post-natally, better understanding of factors that influence bioavailability of vitamin D, and mechanistic insights into vitamin D effects on neonatal-specific immune pathways are awaited |
Variable |
Matsui et al. (59) |
Review |
Variable |
Fall and winter birth could worse food sensitization |
Variable |