Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 18;11:1824. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01824

Table 2.

In silico prediction of Phl p 6 stabilizing mutations using MAESTRO algorithm.

Mutant ΔΔG_pred c_pred ASA
N16M −1.4691 0.886 Buried
D52L −1.3471 0.893 Surface
N16F −1.3469 0.970 Buried
N16Y −1.3052 0.982 Buried
E39L −1.2817 0.890 Surface
S46Y −1.2734 0.955 Buried
N16L −1.2711 0.816 Buried
S46F −1.2654 0.930 Buried
M1R −1.2512 0.871 Surface
N16W −1.2431 0.964 Buried

Stabilizing mutations selected for expression and further analysis are marked in red. ΔΔG_pred, predicted change in free energy [kcal/mol]. Negative values indicate a stabilizing mutation; c_pred, confidence estimation (0–1) of the prediction; 1, high confidence; ASA, accessible surface area: <30% = buried, >30% = surface exposed.