TABLE 3.
Comparisons of MIC10, MIC50, and MIC90 of Allium sativum L. and Rosmarinus officinalis L. essential oil (μL/L) in reduction of the mycelial growth of Colletotrichum nymphaeae CCTUCCh32 (at confidence limit 95%) using contact and vapor assays on potato dextrose agar.
| Plant EOs | MIC10 | MIC50 | MIC90 | a | b2 | χ2 | R2 |
| Contact method | |||||||
| A. sativum | 1.28 | 10.10 | 79.57 | 1.43 ± 0.11 | −1.43 ± 0.16 | 17.88 | 0.90 |
| R. officinalis | 18.56 | 75.49 | 306.96 | 2.11 ± 0.17 | −3.96 ± 0.34 | 45.56 | 0.81 |
| Vapor method | |||||||
| A. sativum | 0.03 | 3.74 | 421.24 | 0.62 ± 0.11 | −0.35 ± 0.14 | 7.35 | 0.81 |
| R. officinalis | 3.06 | 43.77 | 624.42 | 1.11 ± 0.13 | −1.82 ± 0.24 | 12.63 | 0.83 |
MIC10, MIC50, and MIC90 represent minimum inhibitory concentration of essential oil to inhibit mycelial growth to 10, 50, and 90%, respectively. a = Slope; b2 = intercept; R2 = correlation coefficient.