Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 20;14(8):e0008451. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008451

Table 2. Model-based estimates of the prevalence, diagnostic errors, and mean infection intensity (posterior mean and 95% Bayesian credible intervals, BCI).

Estimate 95% BCI
‘True’ prevalence (π) (%) 35.3 33.7–36.9
Urine filtration sensitivity (%) 53.8 51.3–56.2
Microhematuria sensitivity (%) 52.2 49.7–54.7
Macrohematuria sensitivity (%) 11.5 10.4–12.6
Questionnaire sensitivity (%) 70.0 67.7–72.4
Microhematuria specificity (%) 95.6 95.0–96.2
Macrohematuria specificity (%) 99.3 99.1–99.5
Questionnaire specificity (%) 93.7 92.6–94.7
‘True’ infected mean (μ) (%) 45.4 42.2–48.9
‘True’ full mean (μπ) (%) 15.4 14.3–16.4