Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cognit Ther Res. 2018 Nov 16;43(3):620–630. doi: 10.1007/s10608-018-9979-5

Table 2.

Correlation coefficients among predictor and baseline participant variables

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11.
1. Age --
2. Sex −.01 --
3. Education .23* .05 --
4. Comorbid anxiety −.03 .21* .11 --
5. Agreeableness .21* −.03 .11 −.20 --
6. Conscientiousness .21* .01 .18 −.16 .09 --
7. Extraversion .05 .08 −.11 −.02 .03 .27* --
8. Neuroticism −.07 .35 −.05 .24 −.23* −.24* −.07 --
9. Openness .07 −.16 .15 −.11 .11 .10 .22* −.09 --
10. Skill use −.18 .14 −.07 .05 −.04 −.01 −.04 .17 −.11 --
11. Technical difficulties .04 −.04 .06 −.13 .03 −.09 −.06 .05 .06 .08 --
12. PHQ-9 at intake −.05 −.07 −.09 .20 −.07 −.30* −.12 .20* −.07 −.07 .19*

Note. Spearman correlations were calculated between continuous variables, point biserial correlations were calculated between binary and continuous variables, and phi coefficients were calculated between binary variables. Items 5 – 9 were measured with the Big Five Inventory. PHQ-9: Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Module.

*

p <.05.