Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cognit Ther Res. 2018 Nov 16;43(3):620–630. doi: 10.1007/s10608-018-9979-5

Table 5.

Predictors of dropout using two alternative definitions of dropout.

Model 1 Model 2

Predictors RR 95% CI p RR 95% CI p
Age 1.01 0.99–1.03 .52 1.00 0.97–1.04 .85
Gender (male) 1.41 0.84–2.36 .20 1.39 0.58–3.34 .46
Education 0.77 0.59–0.99 .045 0.96 0.64–1.42 .83
Comorbid anxiety 0.80 0.48–1.34 .40 1.75 0.53–5.81 .36
Agreeableness 0.95 0.73–1.23 .69 1.08 0.67–1.73 .76
Conscientiousness 0.93 0.71–1.21 .59 1.04 0.70–1.55 .85
Extraversion 0.74 0.59–0.94 .01 0.50 0.29–0.86 .01
Neuroticism 1.07 0.85–1.34 .57 1.20 0.81–1.78 .36
Openness 1.07 0.95–1.48 .13 1.04 0.71–1.52 .84
Technical difficulties 1.23 0.957–1.58 .09 1.29 0.90–1.85 .17
Participant skill use 0.41 0.31–0.55 <.001 0.60 0.43–0.83 <.01

Note. In model 1, dropout is defined as those who did not complete more than half of the treatment modules (dropout n = 38). In model 2, dropout is defined as those who both did not experience treatment response and completed fewer than 75% of the modules (dropout n = 19). N = 117.