Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 1;212:118743. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118743

Table 4.

Results of MCS test.

Forecasting models QLIKE
MSE
Range SeimQ Range SeimQ
Panel A: h = 1
MIDAS-RV 0.0748 0.0517 0.8417 0.8892
MIDAS-RV-OVX 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000
MS-MIDAS-RV 0.0748 0.0289 0.4609 0.6597
MS-MIDAS-RV-OVX 0.3092 0.3092 0.8417 0.8892
Panel B: h = 5
MIDAS-RV 0.0954 0.0449 0.6194 0.4028
MIDAS-RV-OVX 0.0954 0.0449 0.6194 0.4028
MS-MIDAS-RV 0.0954 0.0449 0.6194 0.4028
MS-MIDAS-RV-OVX 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000
Panel C: h = 20
MIDAS-RV 0.0008 0.0073 0.0028 0.0184
MIDAS-RV-OVX 0.0053 0.0167 0.0094 0.0445
MS-MIDAS-RV 0.6794 0.6794 1.0000 1.0000
MS-MIDAS-RV-OVX 1.0000 1.0000 0.9449 0.9449

Notes: This table shows the results of MCS test, and the p-value is calculated according to the range and semi-quadratic (SeimQ) statistics. Two criteria, i.e., QLIKE and MSE are adapted. The p-values > 0. 25 and p-values = 1 are overstriking and underlined. Different horizons h = 1, 5 and 20 are shown in Panel A, B, C. In this table, the MCS test p-value of 1indicates a better prediction.