Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 1;212:118743. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118743

Table 6.

The result of alternative realized measures (RK) with the MCS test.

Forecasting models QLIKE
MSE
Range SeimQ Range SeimQ
Panel A: h = 1
MIDAS-RV 1.0000 1.0000 0.9426 0.9426
MIDAS-RV-OVX 0.7715 0.7715 1.0000 1.0000
MS-MIDAS-RV 0.0000 0.0009 0.0004 0.0007
MS-MIDAS-RV-OVX 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001
Panel B: h = 5
MIDAS-RV 0.1644 0.1676 0.2406 0.2013
MIDAS-RV-OVX 0.3511 0.3511 0.3074 0.3074
MS-MIDAS-RV 0.0643 0.0374 0.0828 0.0496
MS-MIDAS-RV-OVX 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000
Panel C: h = 20
MIDAS-RV 0.6208 0.5123 0.6254 0.5210
MIDAS-RV-OVX 0.6208 0.5123 0.6254 0.5210
MS-MIDAS-RV 0.2661 0.2269 0.2460 0.2197
MS-MIDAS-RV-OVX 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000

Notes: This table exhibits models’ MCS p-values with alternative realized measures (RK). The forecasts for different horizons h = 1, 5 and 20 are shown in Panel A, B, C. In this table, the MCS test p-value of 1indicates a better prediction.