Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 1;212:118743. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118743

Table 7.

The result of alternative lags of OVX with the MCS test.

Forecasting models QLIKE
MSE
Range SeimQ Range SeimQ
Panel A: h = 1
MIDAS-RV 0.0859 0.0528 1.0000 1.0000
MIDAS-RV-OVX 1.0000 1.0000 0.9922 0.9901
MS-MIDAS-RV 0.0859 0.0596 0.8269 0.9213
MS-MIDAS-RV-OVX 0.2020 0.2020 0.9922 0.9901
Panel B: h = 5
MIDAS-RV 0.1107 0.0492 0.4408 0.2861
MIDAS-RV-OVX 0.1107 0.0492 0.4408 0.2427
MS-MIDAS-RV 0.1107 0.0682 0.4408 0.2960
MS-MIDAS-RV-OVX 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000
Panel C: h = 20
MIDAS-RV 0.0058 0.0144 0.0163 0.0544
MIDAS-RV-OVX 0.0069 0.0202 0.0163 0.0518
MS-MIDAS-RV 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000
MS-MIDAS-RV-OVX 0.7455 0.7455 0.3898 0.3898

Notes: This table exhibits models’ MCS p-values with alternative lags of OVX, more specifically, we choose the two lags of OVX. The forecasts for different horizons of h = 1, 5, 20 are shown in Panel A, B, C. In this table, the MCS test p-value of 1indicates a better prediction.