Table 2. Bayesian Regression model results of the effect of group identity, number of available hunters and ecological variation on prey species captured (¹anomalure and ²Ekalakala as reference categories). .

All numeric predictor variables were standardized to mean = 0 and sd = 1.

Coded level	Term	Estimate	SE	95% CI
Duiker1	Intercept	−3.25	1.04	−5.50,–1.51
	Group (Kokoalongo2)	4.56	1.57	1.93, 8.03
	Available male hunters	0.43	0.77	−1.05, 1.99
	Available female hunters	0.42	0.75	−1.07, 1.90
	Association	−0.77	0.74	−2.30, 0.68
	Usage difference	0.39	0.55	−0.63, 1.52
	Sine of Date	1.24	0.82	−0.33, 2.89
	Cosine of Date	0.00	0.84	−1.68, 1.63
Squirrel1	Intercept	−3.32	1.03	−5.61,–1.52
	Group (Kokoalongo2)	4.99	1.51	2.34, 8.21
	Available male hunters	0.50	0.80	−1.09, 2.11
	Available female hunters	−0.18	0.77	−1.66, 1.30
	Association	−0.61	0.73	−2.06, 0.79
	Usage difference	0.71	0.55	−0.32, 1.89
	Sine of Date	1.03	0.79	−0.47, 2.67
	Cosine of Date	0.36	0.81	−1.21, 1.92