Chart 2. Quality of evidence interpretation following the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system.a .
| Quality of evidence | Implication | Example |
|---|---|---|
| High ⨁⨁⨁⨁ | Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect; we are confident that we can expect a very similar effect in the population for which the recommendation is intended | Randomized trials without serious limitations Well-performed observational studies with very large effects |
| Moderate ⨁⨁⨁◯ | Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate | Randomized trials with serious limitations Well-performed observational studies yielding large effects |
| Low ⨁⨁◯◯ | Further research is very likely to have a major impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate | Randomized trials with very serious limitations Observational studies without special strengths or important limitations |
| Very low ⨁◯◯◯ | Any estimate of effect is very uncertain | Randomized trials with very serious limitations and inconsistent results Observational studies with serious limitations Unsystematic clinical observations (e.g., case series or case reports) |
Adapted from the Brazilian National Ministry of Health. 37