Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar-Apr;46(2):e20190423. doi: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20190423

Chart 2. Quality of evidence interpretation following the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system.a .

Quality of evidence Implication Example
High ⨁⨁⨁⨁ Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect; we are confident that we can expect a very similar effect in the population for which the recommendation is intended Randomized trials without serious limitations
Well-performed observational studies with very large effects
Moderate ⨁⨁⨁◯ Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate Randomized trials with serious limitations
Well-performed observational studies yielding large effects
Low ⨁⨁◯◯ Further research is very likely to have a major impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate Randomized trials with very serious limitations
Observational studies without special strengths or important limitations
Very low ⨁◯◯◯ Any estimate of effect is very uncertain Randomized trials with very serious limitations and inconsistent results
Observational studies with serious limitations
Unsystematic clinical observations (e.g., case series or case reports)
a

Adapted from the Brazilian National Ministry of Health. 37