Table 3.

Effects of feeding program on digestibility in weaning pigs

Items (%)	TRT11)	TRT21)	TRT31)	TRT41)	TRT51)	TRT61)	TRT71)	TRT81)	SEM	p-value2)
	High nutrition density				Low nutrition density					Probiotics	Feed type	Nutrition density	Probiotics × feed type	Feed type × nutrition density	Probiotics × nutrition density	Interaction
	Dry type		Wet type		Dry type		Wet type
	NC	Probiotics	NC	Probiotics	NC	Probiotics	NC	Probiotics
5 d
Dry matter	83.31	84.21	84.38	84.77	84.21	84.25	83.50	83.97	0.53	0.245	0.315	0.341	0.637	0.276	0.168	0.750
Nitrogen	82.64	83.23	83.81	82.58	83.03	83.65	83.64	83.69	0.91	0.156	0.267	0.543	0.104	0.739	0.624	0.448
Energy	83.86	84.35	84.75	85.36	84.68	83.79	85.31	85.22	0.77	0.265	0.543	0.438	0.681	0.963	0.624	0.541
10 d
Dry matter	84.50	84.93	83.51	85.06	84.44	83.79	85.04	83.89	0.95	0.854	0.453	0.631	0.360	0.357	0.400	0.509
Nitrogen	83.57	82.65	83.62	84.31	83.65	84.31	82.86	83.06	0.59	0.804	0.654	0.265	0.664	0.631	0.817	0.168
Energy	83.83	84.35	84.75	85.36	84.32	85.28	83.31	85.16	0.80	0.647	0.169	0.735	0.261	0.736	0.547	0.440
25 d
Dry matter	84.34	85.94	85.08	86.89	84.32	84.78	85.43	84.66	0.69	0.122	0.174	0.116	0.725	0.599	0.060	0.458
Nitrogen	82.61	84.85	83.83	85.05	82.97	83.41	83.60	83.41	0.78	0.187	0.361	0.099	0.724	0.458	0.154	0.863
Energy	83.97	84.80	84.45	86.01	82.84	84.10	84.42	83.83	0.80	0.078	0.189	0.180	0.863	0.620	0.448	0.257

SEM, pooled Standard error of means; NC, negative control.

¹⁾TRT1, high nutrition density feed × dry type × none; TRT2, high nutrition density feed × dry type × probiotics; TRT3, high nutrition density feed × wet type × none; TRT4, high nutrition density feed × wet type × probiotics; TRT5, low nutrition density feed × dry type × none; TRT6, low nutrition density feed × dry type × probiotics; TRT7, low nutrition density feed × wet type × none; TRT8, low nutrition density feed × wet type × probiotics.

²⁾p<0.05 was considered statistically significant, whereas p<0.10 was considered a tendency.