Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 2;370:m2984. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2984

Table 2.

Results from Cox regression analyses on workplace sexual harassment stratified by sex, presented as hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals with and without adjustment for covariates

All Men Women
No with valid data No of cases HR (95% CI) No with valid data No of cases HR (95% CI) No with valid data No of cases HR (95% CI)
Suicide
Model 0* 85 205 125 2.23 (1.19 to 4.16) 40853 87 2.99 (1.09 to 8.18) 44 353 38 3.20 (1.39 to 7.33)
Model 1 84 238 124 2.82 (1.49 to 5.34) 40421 86 2.62 (0.95 to 7.19) 43 817 38 2.94 (1.28 to 6.76)
Model 2 83 048 121 2.51 (1.29 to 4.90) 39877 84 2.62 (0.95 to 7.22) 43 171 37 2.39 (0.98 to 5.80)
Model 3§ 82 860 121 2.47 (1.25 to 4.87) 39794 84 2.60 (0.92 to 7.34) 43 066 37 2.25 (0.91 to 5.56)
Suicide attempts
Model 0* 84 556 816 1.54 (1.19 to 2.01) 40540 397 1.79 (1.03 to 3.11) 44 016 419 1.49 (1.10 to 2.02)
Model 1 83 600 799 1.59 (1.21 to 2.08) 40111 391 1.80 (1.03 to 3.13) 43 489 408 1.49 (1.09 to 2.02)
Model 2 82 419 786 1.55 (1.18 to 2.04) 39570 385 1.78 (1.02 to 3.11) 42 849 401 1.44 (1.06 to 1.98)
Model 3§ 82 233 785 1.56 (1.18 to 2.05) 39488 384 1.77 (1.01 to 3.12) 42 745 401 1.47 (1.07 to 2.02)
*

Unadjusted analyses.

Adjusted for sex, birth country, family situation, education, and income at baseline.

Adjusted for sex, birth country, family situation, education, income, and poor mental health at baseline.

§

Adjusted for sex, birth country, family situation, education, income, demands, control, social support at work, workplace bullying, and poor mental health at baseline.