Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 24;14(9):2163–2175. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12713

Table 2.

Assessment of diagnostic value of DNA methylation markers. CI, confidence interval.

Test Sample type Disease + (n) Controls (n) Fisher's exact test P‐value (two‐sided) Sensitivity Specificity Relative risk (95% CI) a Diagnostic odds ratio (95% CI) a Diagnostic accuracy (%) Positive predictive value (95% CI) Negative predictive value (95% CI)
Cytology BW 90 31 < 0.0001 0.59 (0.49–0.69) 1.00 (0.89–1.00) 1.84 (1.48–2.28) 89.9 (5.3–1516) 69 1.00 (0.93–1.00) 0.46 (0.33–0.58)
CDH1 BW 90 31 0.0001 0.64 (0.54–0.74) 0.74 (0.55–0.88) 1.51 (1.19–1.92) 5.2 (2.1–13.0) 68 0.88 (0.77–0.94) 0.42 (0.29–0.56)
DLC1 BW 69 27 0.0027 0.37 (0.26–0.48) 0.94 (0.79–0.99) 1.48 (1.22–1.79) 8.4 (1.9–37.8) 53 0.94 (0.79–0.99) 0.37 (0.26–0.48)
PRPH BW 79 30 < 0.0001 0.40 (0.30–0.51) 1.00 (0.89–1.00) 1.57 (1.34–1.85) 42.2 (2.5–712) 56 1.00 (0.90–1.00) 0.36 (0.27–0.48)
RASSF1A BW 91 31 < 0.0001 0.46 (0.35–0.56) 1.00 (0.89–1.00) 1.63 (1.37–1.94) 52.8 (3.1–890) 60 1.00 (0.91–1.00) 0.39 (0.28–0.50)
RASSF1A/ CDH1/ PRPH/ DLC1 BW 91 31 < 0.0001 0.97 (0.91–0.99) 0.74 (0.55–0.88) 7.33 (2.54–21.2) 76.1 (18.6–312) 88 0.92 (0.84–0.96) 0.87 (0.68––0.97)
a

Since the values of the contingency table included a zero, the odds ratio was calculated by adding 0.5 to each value of the table.