Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 24;13(8):1818–1840. doi: 10.1111/eva.12930

Table 3.

Named type of Siwa, sampling effort, and genetic identity

Named type No. of sample Nuc Identity Cp Identity
ṣaɛidi [tasutet] 13 97.59% 100%
alkak 11 100% 100%
aɣzāl 4 97.06% 100%
ḥalu en ɣanem 3 100% 100%
taṭṭagt 8 100%* 100%
úšik niqbel/ úšik en gubel 12 69.96% 92.86%
ɣrom aɣzāl 6 28.02% 88.03%
alkak wen žemb 6 28.24% 88.44%
ɣrom ṣaɛid 2 29.41% 0%
lekrawmet 4 40.20% 100%
úšik amaɣzuz/ amaɣzuz 2 23.53% 100%
úšik azzugaɣ 4 31.92% 100%
amenzu 7 24.56% 90.68%
úšik nekwayes 11 29.41% 84.04%
úšik ezzuwaɣ/ zuwaɣ [tazuwaɣt] 8 27.95% 46.43%
kaɛibī 6 20.39% 40.00%
úšik #1 18 23.97% 47.06%
úšik #2 22 27.02% 58.44%
tazuwaɣt 1 / /
tažubart 1 / /

For each named type, the local name of the dates is given, followed by the possible name of the palm [in brackets]. The identity is the average proportion of matching genotypes among accessions of a given named type and across the 17 nuclear microsatellites (Nuc Identity) and the chloroplastic minisatellite (Cp Identity).

*

one accession (3,377) was identified as an identification error of the informer. When included, average identity across this set of accession is 79.41%.