Table 2.
Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) quality assessment of each cohort study.
| Study | Selection | Comparability | Outcome | NOS score | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Representativeness of the exposed cohort | Selection of the nonexposed cohort | Ascertainment of exposure | Demonstration that outcome of interest was not present at start of study | Comparability of cohorts on the basis of the design or analysis | Assessment of outcome | Was follow-up long enough for outcomes to occur | Adequacy of follow-up of cohorts | ||
| Tsumura et al. (1999) [29] | ∗ | ∗ | NA | ∗ | ∗∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | 8 |
| Noriyuki et al. (2003) [30] | ∗ | ∗ | NA | ∗ | ∗∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | 8 |
| Lee et al. (2003) [31] | ∗ | ∗ | NA | ∗ | ∗∗ | ∗ | NA | ∗ | 7 |
| Waki et al. (2005) [32] | ∗ | ∗ | NA | ∗ | ∗∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | 8 |
| Shi et al. (2013) [12] | ∗ | ∗ | NA | ∗ | ∗∗ | ∗ | NA | ∗ | 7 |
| Lee et al. (2017) [13] | ∗ | ∗ | NA | ∗ | ∗∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | 8 |
| Zhang et al. (2017) [14] | ∗ | ∗ | NA | ∗ | ∗∗ | ∗ | NA | ∗ | 7 |
| Yatsuya et al. (2018) [15] | ∗ | ∗ | NA | ∗ | NA | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | 6 |
∗: 1 point, ∗∗: 2 points, NA: no point.