Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 5;11(8):898. doi: 10.3390/genes11080898

Table 2.

Performance comparison of DNA6mA-MINT with existing techniques on different species with 5- and 10-fold cross-validation.

Model Species Folds SN SP ACC MCC auROC
iDNA6mA-PseKNC M. musculus 5 0.869 1 0.935 0.877 0.974
Rice 5 0.569 0.721 0.641 0.394 0.896
Combined-species 5 0.762 0.769 0.765 0.531 0.844
csDMA M. musculus 5 0.932 1 0.966 0.935 0.974
Rice 5 0.842 0.880 0.861 0.723 0.923
Combined-species 5 0.863 0.735 0.799 0.603 0.879
ilM-CNN M. musculus 5 0.938 1 0.969 0.941 0.971
Rice 5 0.841 0.914 0.875 0.752 0.934
Combined-species 5 0.869 0.780 0.824 0.651 0.892
6mA-Finder M. musculus 10 0.9349 1 0.9674 0.935 0.9954
Rice 10 - - - - 0.9394
Combined-species 10 - - - - 0.9207
DNA6mA-MINT M. musculus 5 0.9531 1 0.9766 0.9543 0.980
Rice 5 0.8621 0.9195 0.8908 0.7829 0.950
Combined-species 5 0.9182 0.9409 0.9295 0.8593 0.950
DNA6mA-MINT M. musculus 10 0.9427 1 0.9714 0.9444 0.98
Rice 10 0.9425 0.908 0.9253 0.8511 0.950
Combined-species 10 0.9318 0.9321 0.932 0.8639 0.960