Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 10;9(8):2585. doi: 10.3390/jcm9082585

Table 5.

Soft tissue evaluation at prosthetic delivery and at the 5-year follow-up.

Prosthetic Delivery 5-y Follow-Up Significance (p)
n Mean SD n Mean SD D → 5y
PD in mm
Mesial tooth 35 2.19a 0.74 35 2.56a 1.41 0.005
Implant 47 2.67b 0.75 48 3.27b 0.64 <0.001 *
Distal tooth 26 2.38b 0.63 24 2.44a 0.64 0.787
CAL in mm
Mesial tooth 35 2.68ab 1.00 35 2.8a 0.85 0.293
Implant 47 2.64a 0.92 48 2.68b 0.80 0.986
Distal tooth 26 2.74b 0.84 24 2.59a 0.98 0.142
GR in mm
Mesial tooth 35 0.44a 0.63 35 0.52a 0.54 0.127
Implant 47 0.34a 0.43 48 0.25b 0.30 0.005
Distal tooth 26 0.54a 0.59 24 0.46ab 0.57 0.955
mPI
Mesial tooth 35 0.52a 0.60 35 0.61a 0.52 0.277
Implant 47 0.29b 0.41 48 0.49b 0.47 <0.001 *
Distal tooth 26 0.76c 0.61 24 0.69a 0.58 0.022
mBI
Mesial tooth 35 0.36a 0.39 35 0.20a 0.29 <0.001
Implant 47 0.51a 0.41 48 0.87b 0.54 <0.001 *
Distal tooth 26 0.43a 0.42 24 0.38c 0.55 0.708

n = number of units, SD = standard deviation, PD = probing depth, CAL = clinical attachment level, GR = “gingival” recession, mPI = modified Plaque Index, mBI = modified Bleeding Index. Different bold letters (a, b, c) behind the mean values indicate significant differences between teeth and implants. Significant differences regarding the type of reconstruction (SC or FDP) were superscripted with *. D = Prosthetic delivery; 5y = 5-year follow-up.