Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 31;12(8):2132. doi: 10.3390/cancers12082132

Table 1.

Outcomes reported in the clinical trials examined and model parameters.

Variables Base-Case References
First-line systemic treatments
Median PFS (months) reported in RCTs
Sorafenib 3.8 mo [12,14,24,25,26,27]
Lenvatinib 7.4 mo [12]
Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab 6.8 mo [14]
Median PFS (IQR) (months) obtained with Weibull distribution
Sorafenib 4.6 (6.7) mo
Lenvatinib 8.8 (11.7) mo
Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab 7.2 (9.3) mo
SAEs
Sorafenib 72.3% [12,14,24,25]
Lenvatinib 75% [12]
Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab 61% [14]
Second-line systemic treatments
Median OS (months) reported in RCTs
Regorafenib 10.6 mo. [15]
Cabozantinib 10.2 mo [16]
Ramucirumab 9.2 mo [28]
Nivolumab 15.1 mo [20]
Pembrolizumab 13.9 mo [23]
Median OS (IQR) (months) obtained with Weibull distribution
Regorafenib 11.4 (14.4) mo
Cabozantinib 11.4 (14) mo
Ramucirumab 11.3 (14.5) mo
Nivolumab 16.4 (23.2) mo
Pembrolizumab 14 (17.8) mo
SAEs
Regorafenib 79.7% [15]
Cabozantinib 79.4% [16]
Ramucirumab 70.4% [28]
Nivolumab 18.6% * [20]
Pembrolizumab 52.7% [23]

OS, overall survival. PFS, Progression-free survival. mo, months. IQR, Interquartile Range. SD, Standard Deviation. SAEs, severe adverse events. BCLC, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer. RCTs, randomized controlled trials. For Sorafenib, data were pooled from the available RCTs [14,16,24,25,26,27]. * Because the incidence of treatment emergent AEs was not reported for Nivolumab, we reported severe treatment-related adverse events.