Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 31;12(8):2132. doi: 10.3390/cancers12082132

Table 2.

Base-case effectiveness and safety of 15 treatment sequences according to median OS.

Treatment Sequence Median OS (mo) NNT 36-Month OS (%) LYG (yr) SAEs (%)
Lenvatinib-Nivolumab 27 5 32.9 0.75 48.0
Lenvatinib-Pembrolizumab 25 7 26.8 0.58 64.4
Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab-Nivolumab 24 6 29.5 0.50 40.2
Sorafenib-Nivolumab 23 7 26.1 0.42 46.3
Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab-Pembrolizumab 23 9 23.4 0.42 57.1
Lenvatinib-Ramucirumab 22 13 19.9 0.33 72.8
Lenvatinib-Regorafenib 22 14 19.3 0.33 77.2
Lenvatinib-Cabozantinib 22 14 19.2 0.33 77.2
Sorafenib-Pembrolizumab 20 15 18.9 0.17 62.9
Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab-Ramucirumab 20 23 16.7 0.17 65.6
Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab-Regorafenib 20 29 15.8 0.17 70.0
Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab-Cabozantinib 20 30 15.6 0.17 69.9
Sorafenib-Cabozantinib 18 83 11.1 0.00 75.8
Sorafenib-Regorafenib 18 200 11.8 0.00 75.9
Sorafenib-Ramucirumab 18 - 12.3 0.00 71.4

LYG, life-year gained. All the sequences were compared to the worst sequence (Sorafenib-Ramucirumab). OS, overall survival. SAEs, severe adverse events. NNT, number needed to treat. yr, years. mo, months.