Table 3.
Performance comparison of different coupled photoelectrocatalytic/enzymatic CO2 reduction systems.
| Photoanode | Photocathode | Efficiency a | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Co-Pi/Fe2O3 | ITO/FDH | HCOOH, 6.4 μM h−1 | [131] |
| CoPi/BiVO4 | EC-PDA | HCOOH, FE: 99.18% | [112] |
| Co-Pi/αoFe2O3 | BiFeO3-CcFDH/PcFaldDH/YADH | CH3OH, 220 μM h−1 | [137] |
| FTO/IO-TiO2/dPP/POs-PSII | FTO/IO-TiO2/FDH | HCOOH, 0.185 μM cm–2 | [140] |
| FTO/FeOOH/BiVO4 | FTO/3D TiN-ClFDH | HCOOH, 0.78 μM h−1, FE: 77.3% | [113] |
| TK/TiO2 | FDH-CH3V(CH2)9COOH | HCOOH, 30.0 nM after 3 h | [141] |
| Plain graphite rod | Pt-FDH | HCOOH, 15.49 μM mg Enzyme−1 min−1 | [142] |
a The efficiency includes the product and rates.