Surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRAs) vs. rank. (A), change in forced vital capacity % of predicted (FVC %); (B), change in diffusion lung capacity for CO % of predicted (DLCO %); (C), number of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs); (D), number of patients discontinuing treatment for adverse events (AEs); (E), deaths. Treatments have been ranked according to SUCRAs. For example, in (A), rituximab is the treatment with the highest probability of being the best (RANK 1) having the highest SUCRA (95.7). (C–E), treatment with the best rank are those with better tolerability, safety, and lower number of deaths, respectively.