Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 30;8(8):1156. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8081156

Table 1.

Differential bacterial taxonomic profile at the genus level in the DIO + MaR1 vs. the DIO mice.

Downregulated in DIO + MaR1 vs. DIO Upregulated in DIO + MaR1 vs. DIO
Genus LogFC p Genus LogFC P
Gluconacetobacter −2.007 0.001 Pseudobutyrivibrio 2.771 0.009
Pseudomonas −1.595 0.001 Chthoniobacter 1.723 0.010
Psychrobacter −0.841 0.001 Planifilum 1.190 0.022
Hymenobacter −0.776 0.002 Sphaerisporangium 1.146 0.026
Microvirus −1.356 0.004 Dethiosulfovibrio 1.031 0.033
Neorickettsia −1.068 0.007 Euzebya 0.879 0.044
Rikenella −1.288 0.011 Actinomyces 0.681 0.045
Thiothrix −0.584 0.011 Faecalibacterium 1.000 0.049
Candidatus Amoebophilus −0.758 0.012
Emticicia −0.899 0.023
Gillisia −0.670 0.032
Tetragenococcus −0.549 0.032
Thiothrix −0.584 0.011
Enterococcus −1.378 0.033
Polaribacter −0.792 0.037
Paraprevotella −0.933 0.039
Candidatus Glomeribacter −0.647 0.042
Coraliomargarita −1.223 0.049

Negative log fold change (LogFC) was related to lower representation in the DIO + MaR1 as compared with the DIO, whereas positive LogFC corresponds to those genera that increased in the DIO + MaR1 as compared with the DIO. Genera were organized by their significance (p). DIO mice were treated by oral gavage with Maresin 1 (MaR1, 50 μg/kg/day) for 10 days.