Table 4.

Qualitative outcomes.

Author and Country	Outcome Measure	Outcome Measure Result
Bini 2017, USA [23]	PRO (questionnaire)	Patient satisfaction overall with both the traditional patient care pathway and the digital interface was high, and there was no major difference.
Nelson 2017, Australia [29]	Questionnaire Franzen and Oppenheim	Only 35% reported feeling confident using technology. The results change considerably with advancing age: Telerehabilitation is feasible from the perspective of access to, feelings toward, and preferences for technology.
Doiron-Cadrin 2020, Canada [27]	Questionnaire	All participants (100%) felt they met their rehabilitation goals, felt positive about their telerehabilitation experience, and were satisfied with their physiotherapy treatments.
Babic 2019, Norway [16]	Interview A scale from one (low) to 5 (high) to collect the feedback.	The responses were that sometimes, negative feedback concerned nausea occurring during VR, but the overall experience was positive.
Naeemabadi 2020, Denmark [32]	Interviews Questionnaires (Likert scale)	Iteration 4: The user-friendliness of the TR was high to very high. The patients reported a lower level of satisfaction in the area of communication and training with the wearable sensors. Iteration 5: The level of motivation among patients increased. A higher level of self-confidence was reported. The participants believed that physiotherapist’s feedback on the patients’ performance and questions induced a sense of security. The majority of the users claim that the system can considerably reduce the need for travel.