Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 6;93(1113):20200321. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20200321

Table 2.

Differences in rSI T1, rSI T2, ER and ADCm between Ki67-IL groups (cut-off ≥ 3%). Significant differences (*) were find in ADCm and ER values.

Ki-67 LI < 3% ≥ 3% p-value
rSI T1 1.11 (1.07 – 1.16) 1.08 (1.02 – 1.11) 0.207
rSI T2 2.11 (1.71 – 2.18) 1.82 (1.26 – 2.26) 0.366
ER 2.14 (1.98 – 2.29) 1.86 (1.62 – 1.92) *0.012
ADCm 0.884 (0.793 – 1.327) 0.542(0.504 – 0.599) *0.017
rADCm 1.07 (1.00 – 1.63) 0.67 (0.64 – 0.81) *0.017

ADCm, mean apparent diffusion coefficient (x 10-6 mm2/sec); ER, enhancement ratio; Ki-67 LI, Ki-67 labelling index; rADCm, relative mean ADC; rSI T1, signal intensity ratio T1-weighted images; rSI T2, signal intensity ratio T2-weighted images.