Table 2.
Author | Intervention(s) | Control | Follow-up | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ansai | Multicomponent training: protocol consisting of warm-up, aerobic, strength, balance, and cool-down exercises for 16 weeks | No intervention | 22 w | There were no significant differences between groups and assessments in any variable. |
Resistance training: leg press, chest press, calf, back extension, abdominal, and rowing for 16 weeks | ||||
Arkkukangas | OEP: home-based exercise program designed to improve strength, balance, and endurance over 12 weeks | No intervention | 12 w | In the short-term perspective, there were no benefits of an exercise program regarding physical performance, fall self-efficacy, activity level, hand-grip strength, and fall frequency in comparison to a CG. |
Arnold | AE protocol consisted of lower- and upper-extremity strengthening, trunk-control, and balance exercises twice a week for 11 weeks (preceded by educational session in the aquatics and education group) | No intervention | 11 w | Significant improvement in fall risk factors (p = 0.038) with the combination of aquatic exercise and education. |
Boongird | Modified OEP: five combined leg-muscle strengthening, balance retraining, and stretching exercises, which progressed in difficulty, and a walking plan | Fall prevention education | 12 m | The incidence of falls was 0.30 falls per person year in the EG, compared with 0.40 in the CG. The fear of falling was significantly lower in the EG than CG (p = 0.003). |
Clemson | Lifestyle Approach to Reducing Falls through Exercise (LiFE) program: home-based balance and strengthening exercise program for fall prevention | No intervention | 6 m | The relative risk analysis demonstrated a significant reduction in falls in EG (RR = 0.23). Dynamic balance improved for the LiFE program participants (p = 0.04). |
El-Khoury | Ossébo program: weekly supervised group sessions of progressive balance training for two years, supplemented by individually prescribed home exercises | No intervention | 24 m | The injurious fall rate was 19% lower in the EG than in the CG (p = 0.04). The EG fared significantly better than the CG in all balance and gait performance tests. |
Gianoudis | Multimodal program incorporating high-velocity progressive resistance training, weight-bearing impact and/or balance training, and fall-prevention exercises, performed three days per week for 12 months | Standard care self-management | 12 m | There were no significant differences in fall incidence between the groups, or in the number of participants sustaining one or more falls or multiple falls. |
Hale | Water-based exercise classes twice weekly for 12 weeks | Time-matched computer training program for 12 weeks | 12 w | Water-based exercise did not reduce falls risk compared with attending a computer-skills training class. |
Hewiit | Resistance training plus balance exercises performed in a group setting for 50 h over a 25-week period (Sunbeam program), followed by a maintenance period for 6 months | Regular activity schedule | 12 m | Overall incidence of falls in the EG of 1.31 per person-year, compared with 2.91 in the CG. A significantly greater improvement was found in physical performance in the EG than in the CG (p = 0.02). |
Jacobson | Standing, static balancing, and mild leg exercise, 12 min per session, three times per week for 12 weeks. | Regular group exercise | 12 w | Significant (p < 0.01) improvement for the EG over the CG in the 30 s chair test repetitions, 8-foot up and go test, balance assessment, and leg-function assessments. |
Leiros-Rodriíguez | 12 sessions of balance exercises for 50 min | No intervention | 4 w | Berg Balance Scale, timed up-and-go test, and SF-12 showed statistically significant differences in the EG (p < 0.05). |
Liu-Ambrose | Usual care plus OEP (a home-based strength and balance retraining exercise program) for 12 months | Fall-prevention care | 11 m | Fall rates were lower in the EG compared with CG (IRR, 0.64; p = 0.009). The estimated fall rate incidence was 1.4 per person-year in the EG and 2.1 in the CG (p = 0.006). |
Miko | 12-month of balance-training exercise program (three times a week for 30 min) | No intervention | 12 m | TUG and BBS test scores showed a statistically significant difference between EG and CG (p < 0.005). The event rate for the number of patients who fell was 0.122 in the EG and 0.229 in the CG, thus the relative risk of falls was 0.534 (p = 0.17). |
Patil | Group exercise classes twice a week for 12 months and once a week for the subsequent 12 months and home exercises | Current physical activity | 24 m | Timed up-and-go and grip strength did not differ between groups. There was no difference in the total falls incidence rate ratio (IRR = 1.0). |
Patti | Joint mobility, cardiovascular exercise, strengthening of core stability, proprioceptive training, and eye–hand/eye–foot coordinative exercises for 13 weeks | No intervention | 14 w | Only the EG group demonstrated significant improvements in balance skills (p < 0.0001). |
Smulders | 11 sessions over 5.5 weeks of education, obstacle course, walking exercises, weight-bearing exercises, correction of gait abnormalities, and training in fall technique | No intervention | 12 m | The fall rate in the exercise group was 39% lower than for the control group (0.72 vs 1.18 falls/person-year; risk ratio of 0.61). |
OEP: Otago Exercise Program; AE: aquatic exercise; w: weeks; m: months; CG: control group; EG: experimental group.